I obtrude this analysis upon the attention of no one: no one, however, will readily deny, that He, Who is , is called יָהּ ; and that remains firm, even though you should derive it with Hiller from יהי , the future; for the phrase, καὶ ὁ ἐρχόμενος , has already before been given ...
Show full excerpt
I obtrude this analysis upon the attention of no one: no one, however, will readily deny, that He, Who is , is called יָהּ ; and that remains firm, even though you should derive it with Hiller from יהי , the future; for the phrase, καὶ ὁ ἐρχόμενος , has already before been given for the pause (close of the formula): see above on ch. Revelation 11:17 . In the three clauses, ὁ ἦν καὶ ὁ ὢ καὶ ὁ ἐρχόμενος , the times had to be accurately distinguished; but when the יָהּ is found separately, the derivation from יהי does not remove the force of present time, as is seen in so many proper names of men. The LXX. use the name, ὁ ὢν , Exodus 3:14 , and (where there was less occasion for it) Jeremiah 1:5 (6), Jeremiah 14:13 , Jeremiah 32:17 : and יָהּ itself has the same meaning as ὁ ὢν , Euthymius explaining it in Fuller, Miscell. pp. 486, 487. Add Drusius on this passage. § 7. That the name יָהּ is not curtailed from the name יְהֹוָה , is evident from this, that יְהֹוָה is used much more frequently than יָהּ , and that it is quoted sometimes jointly יָהּ יְהֹוָה . § 8. As God commanded by Moses that He should be called יְהֹוָהּ , immediately upon the very coming out of Egypt, the name יָהּ was also introduced in the Song of Moses, Exodus 15:2 , in these words: עזי וזמרת יה ויהי לי לישועה , where, from a most present feeling of that most saving Divine work, the Lord is called יָהּ , ὁ ὤν . Hence this name is quoted only in Songs.