Throughout the next two strophes follow terrible imprecations. According to Frst and others the relation of בּושׁ and חפר is like that of erblassen, to turn pale (cf. Isaiah 29:22 with Psalm 34:6 ), and errצthen, to turn red, to blush. בושׁ has, however, no connection with בוץ, n...
Show full excerpt
Throughout the next two strophes follow terrible imprecations. According to Frst and others the relation of בּושׁ and חפר is like that of erblassen, to turn pale (cf. Isaiah 29:22 with Psalm 34:6 ), and errצthen, to turn red, to blush. בושׁ has, however, no connection with בוץ, nor has חפר, Arab. chfr, chmr, any connection with Arab. hmr, to be red; but, according to its radical notion, בּושׁ means disturbari (vid., Psalm 6:11 ), and חפר, obtegere, abscondere (vid., Psalm 34:6 ). יסּגוּ, properly "let them be made to fall back" (cf. e.g., Isaiah 42:17 ). On the figure on Psalm 35:5 cf. Psalm 83:14 . The clauses respecting the Angel of Jahve, Psalm 35:5 and Psalm 35:6 , are circumstantial clauses, viz., clauses defining the manner. דּחה (giving, viz., them, the push that shall cause their downfall, equivalent to דּחם or דּחם, Psalm 68:28 ) is closely connected with the figure in Psalm 35:6 , and רדפם, with the figure in Psalm 35:5 ; consequently it seems as though the original position of these two clauses respecting the Angel of Jahve had been disturbed; just as in Psalm 34 , the ע strophe and the פ strophe have changed their original places. It is the Angel, who took off Pharaoh's chariot wheels so that they drave them heavily ( Exodus 14:25 ) that is intended here.