John ( 1 John 2:1 ; 1 John 5:2 ); but under the economy of the gospel it has a deeper significance than here, as pointing to the "new birth," which, being a later revelation, lies outside the scope of the moral teaching of the Old Testament dispensation. The instruction ( מֶוּסַר...
Show full excerpt
John ( 1 John 2:1 ; 1 John 5:2 ); but under the economy of the gospel it has a deeper significance than here, as pointing to the "new birth," which, being a later revelation, lies outside the scope of the moral teaching of the Old Testament dispensation. The instruction ( מֶוּסַר musar ); as carrying with it the sense of disciplinary education (cf. LXX., παιδεία ; Vulgate, disciplina ; see also ver. 2), and of the correction with which it may be enforced (cf. Proverbs 13:24 ; Proverbs 22:15 ; Proverbs 23:13, 14 ), the writer attributes appropriately to the father, while the milder torah , "law," he uses of the mother (Delitzsch). Father . The nature of the exhortation conveyed in this verse requires that we should understand the terms "father" and "mother" in their natural sense as designating the parents of the persons addressed, though a symbolical meaning has Been attached to them by the rabbis (see Rabbi Salomon, in loc .), "father" being understood as representing God, and "mother," the people. But the terms are more than merely figurative expressions (Stuart). Those who look upon the Proverbs as the address of Solomon to his son Rehoboam naturally take "father" as standing for the former. Naamah, in this case must be the mother ( 1 Kings 14:31 ). It is almost unnecessary to state that pious parents are presupposed, and that only that instruction and law can be meant which is not inconsistent with the higher and more perfect Law of God (Gejerus, Wardlaw).