Philippians 3:2

Philippians 3:2

Commentary from the Reformed tradition and beyond

How we matched these sections:
PinpointedTouchesSemantically Found
Matthew Henry's Concise Commentary — Matthew Henry's Concise Commentary — Philippians (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
3:1-11 Sincere Christians rejoice in Christ Jesus. The prophet calls the false prophets dumb dogs, Isa 56:10; to which the apostle seems to refer. Dogs, for their malice against faithful professors of the gospel of Christ, barking at them and biting them. They urged human works i...
Show full excerpt
3:1-11 Sincere Christians rejoice in Christ Jesus. The prophet calls the false prophets dumb dogs, Isa 56:10; to which the apostle seems to refer. Dogs, for their malice against faithful professors of the gospel of Christ, barking at them and biting them. They urged human works in opposition to the faith of Christ; but Paul calls them evil-workers. He calls them the concision; as they rent the church of Christ, and cut it to pieces. The work of religion is to no purpose, unless the heart is in it, and we must worship God in the strength and grace of the Divine Spirit. They rejoice in Christ Jesus, not in mere outward enjoyments and performances. Nor can we too earnestly guard against those who oppose or abuse the doctrine of free salvation. If the apostle would have gloried and trusted in the flesh, he had as much cause as any man. But the things which he counted gain while a Pharisee, and had reckoned up, those he counted loss for Christ. The apostle did not persuade them to do any thing but what he himself did; or to venture on any thing but that on which he himself ventured his never-dying soul. He deemed all these things to be but loss, compared with the knowledge of Christ, by faith in his person and salvation.
Matthew Henry's Concise Commentary — Matthew Henry's Concise Commentary — Philippians (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
He speaks of all worldly enjoyments and outward privileges which sought a place with Christ in his heart, or could pretend to any merit and desert, and counted them but loss; but it might be said, It is easy to say so; but what would he do when he came to the trial? He had suffer...
Show full excerpt
He speaks of all worldly enjoyments and outward privileges which sought a place with Christ in his heart, or could pretend to any merit and desert, and counted them but loss; but it might be said, It is easy to say so; but what would he do when he came to the trial? He had suffered the loss of all for the privileges of a Christian. Nay, he not only counted them loss, but the vilest refuse, offals thrown to dogs; not only less valuable than Christ, but in the highest degree contemptible, when set up as against him. True knowledge of Christ alters and changes men, their judgments and manners, and makes them as if made again anew. The believer prefers Christ, knowing that it is better for us to be without all worldly riches, than without Christ and his word. Let us see what the apostle resolved to cleave to, and that was Christ and heaven. We are undone, without righteousness wherein to appear before God, for we are guilty. There is a righteousness provided for us in Jesus Christ, and it is a complete and perfect righteousness. None can have benefit by it, who trust in themselves. Faith is the appointed means of applying the saving benefit. It is by faith in Christ's blood. We are made conformable to Christ's death, when we die to sin, as he died for sin; and the world is crucified to us, and we to the world, by the cross of Christ. The apostle was willing to do or to suffer any thing, to attain the glorious resurrection of saints.
Benson Commentary — Benson Commentary — Philippians (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
Php 3:2 . Beware of dogs — Unclean, unholy, rapacious men, who, though they fawn and flatter, would devour you as dogs. He probably gave them this appellation also, because they barked against the doctrines of the gospel, and against its faithful teachers, and were ready to bite ...
Show full excerpt
Php 3:2 . Beware of dogs — Unclean, unholy, rapacious men, who, though they fawn and flatter, would devour you as dogs. He probably gave them this appellation also, because they barked against the doctrines of the gospel, and against its faithful teachers, and were ready to bite and tear all who opposed their errors. Our Lord used the word dogs in the same sense, when he commanded his apostles not to give that which is holy to dogs. Perhaps, by calling them dogs, the apostle might intend to signify likewise, that, in the sight of God, they were now become as abominable, for crucifying Christ, and persecuting his apostles, as the idolatrous heathen were in the eyes of the Jews; who, to express their detestation of them, gave them the name of dogs; a title which the apostle therefore here returns upon themselves. Revelation 22:15 , the wicked are called dogs: without are dogs. Beware of evil workers — Of those Judaizing teachers, who, while they cry up the law, and pretend to be strenuous advocates for good works, are, in fact, evil workers; sowing the seeds of discord, strife, contention, and division, among the simple, humble, and formerly united members of Christ, and acting in direct opposition, not only to the gospel, the true nature of which they do not understand, but even to the most important precepts and grand design of the law itself, for the honour of which they appear to be so zealous.
Benson Commentary — Benson Commentary — Philippians (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
Macknight renders the expression, evil labourers, in opposition to the appellation of fellow-labourers, with which the apostle honoured those who faithfully assisted him in preaching the gospel. The same false teachers he calls false apostles, and deceitful workers, or labourers,...
Show full excerpt
Macknight renders the expression, evil labourers, in opposition to the appellation of fellow-labourers, with which the apostle honoured those who faithfully assisted him in preaching the gospel. The same false teachers he calls false apostles, and deceitful workers, or labourers, 2 Corinthians 11:13 ; because, instead of building, they undermined the Church of Christ, by removing its foundation; beware of the concision — Circumcision being now no longer a rite of entering into covenant with God, the apostle will not call those who used it the circumcision; but coins a term on purpose, taken from a Greek word used by the LXX., Leviticus 21:5 , for such a cutting of the flesh as God had forbidden. Dr. Macknight renders the word the excision: an appellation, says he, “finely contrived to express the pernicious influence of their doctrine; and perhaps also to signify the destruction which was coming on them as a nation.” He adds, “the account given of these wicked men, Romans 16:18 ; Galatians 6:12 ; Titus 1:11 , shows that they deserved all the harsh names given them in this place.”
Geneva Study Bible — Geneva Study Bible — Philippians (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the {b} concision. (b) He alludes to circumcision; and while they were boasting in it, they broke apart the Church.
Vincent's Word Studies — Vincent's Word Studies — Philippians (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
Beware (βλέπετε) Lit., look to. Compare Mark 4:24; Mark 8:15; Luke 21:8. Dogs Rev., correctly, the dogs, referring to a well-known party - the Judaizers. These were nominally Christians who accepted Jesus as the Messiah, but as the Savior of Israel only. They insisted that Chris...
Show full excerpt
Beware (βλέπετε) Lit., look to. Compare Mark 4:24; Mark 8:15; Luke 21:8. Dogs Rev., correctly, the dogs, referring to a well-known party - the Judaizers. These were nominally Christians who accepted Jesus as the Messiah, but as the Savior of Israel only. They insisted that Christ's kingdom could be entered only through the gate of Judaism. Only circumcised converts were fully accepted by God. They appeared quite early in the history of the Church, and are those referred to in Acts 15:1. Paul was the object of their special hatred and abuse. They challenged his birth, his authority, and his motives. "'Paul must be destroyed,' was as truly their watchword as the cry for the destruction of Carthage had been of old to the Roman senator" (Stanley, "Sermons and Lectures on the Apostolic Age"). These are referred to in Philippians 1:16; and the whole passage in the present chapter, from Philippians 3:3 to Philippians 3:11, is worthy of study, being full of incidental hints lurking in single words, and not always apparent in our versions; hints which, while they illustrate the main point of the discussion, are also aimed at the assertions of the Judaizers. Dogs was a term of reproach among both Greeks and Jews. Homer uses it of both women and men, implying shamelessness in the one, and recklessness in the other. Thus Helen: "Brother-in-law of me, a mischief devising dog" ("Iliad," vi., 344). Teucer of Hector: "I cannot hit this raging dog" ("Iliad," viii., 298). Dr.
Vincent's Word Studies — Vincent's Word Studies — Philippians (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
Thomson says of the dogs in oriental towns: "They lie about the streets in such numbers as to render it difficult and often dangerous to pick one's way over and amongst them - a lean, hungry, and sinister brood. They have no owners, but upon some principle known only to themselve...
Show full excerpt
Thomson says of the dogs in oriental towns: "They lie about the streets in such numbers as to render it difficult and often dangerous to pick one's way over and amongst them - a lean, hungry, and sinister brood. They have no owners, but upon some principle known only to themselves, they combine into gangs, each of which assumes jurisdiction over a particular street; and they attack with the utmost ferocity all canine intruders into their territory. In those contests, and especially during the night, they keep up an incessant barking and howling, such as is rarely heard in any European city. The imprecations of David upon his enemies derive their significance, therefore, from this reference to one of the most odious of oriental annoyances" ("Land and Book," Central palestine and Phoenicia, 593). See Psalm 59:6; Psalm 22:16. Being unclean animals, dogs were used to denote what was unholy or profane. So Matthew 7:6; Revelation 22:15. The Israelites are forbidden in Deuteronomy to bring the price of a dog into the house of God for any vow: Deuteronomy 23:18. The Gentiles of the Christian era were denominated "dogs" by the Jews, see Matthew 15:26. Paul here retorts upon them their own epithet. Evil workers Compare deceitful workers, 2 Corinthians 11:13. Concision (κατατομήν) Only here in the New Testament. The kindred verb occurs in the Septuagint only, of mutilations forbidden by the Mosaic law. See Leviticus 21:5. The noun here is a play upon περιτομή circumcision.
Bengel's Gnomen — Bengel's Gnomen — Philippians (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
Php 3:2 . Βλέπετε , see ) A vehement Anaphora,[29] See , and you will avoid; a metonymy of the antecedent for the consequent.[30] The antithesis is σκοπεῖτε , observe, mark ,[31] Php 3:17 ; for Php 3:17 returns to this topic, wonderfully tempered by reproof and exhortation.— τοὺς...
Show full excerpt
Php 3:2 . Βλέπετε , see ) A vehement Anaphora,[29] See , and you will avoid; a metonymy of the antecedent for the consequent.[30] The antithesis is σκοπεῖτε , observe, mark ,[31] Php 3:17 ; for Php 3:17 returns to this topic, wonderfully tempered by reproof and exhortation.— τοὺς κύνας , the dogs ) Undoubtedly he used this appellation often in their presence, Php 3:18 , and he now brought it to the recollection of the Philippians; and hence they would more easily understand it than we. Comp. 2 Thessalonians 2:5 . The three members of the following verse correspond, by a retrograde gradation (descending climax), to the three clauses of this verse; so that the dogs are the false apostles and carnal men, who do not trust in Christ, but in the flesh, and are slaves to foul lusts [ utter strangers to true holiness, although exulting in the name of Jews.—V. g.], Php 3:19 . So the term dogs is applied to ἐβδελυγμένοις , those to be abominated , Revelation 22:15 ; comp. Revelation 21:8 ; or in other words, the abominable , impure ( βδελυκτοὶ , ΜΕΜΙΑΜΜΈΝΟΙς ), Titus 1:16 ; Titus 1:15 , strangers to holiness, Matthew 7:6 ; quite different from Paul, living and dying; for in life they abound to overflowing in the vices of dogs, in filthiness, unchastity, snarling, 2 Peter 2:22 ; Deuteronomy 23:19 (18); Psalm 59:7 ; Psalm 59:16 ; and they are most of all the enemies of the cross of Christ, Php 3:18 ; comp.
Bengel's Gnomen — Bengel's Gnomen — Philippians (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
Psalm 22:17 ; Psalm 22:21 : and in death they are dead dogs (by which proverb something of the vilest sort is denoted): comp. Php 3:19 . That saying is applicable to these, which is commonly used, Take care of the dog .[32] The Jews considered the Gentiles as dogs; see at Matthew...
Show full excerpt
Psalm 22:17 ; Psalm 22:21 : and in death they are dead dogs (by which proverb something of the vilest sort is denoted): comp. Php 3:19 . That saying is applicable to these, which is commonly used, Take care of the dog .[32] The Jews considered the Gentiles as dogs; see at Matthew 15:26 ; they are now called dogs, who are unwilling to be the Israel of God.— τοὺς κακοὺς ἐργάτας , evil workers ) who do not serve God; comp. 2 Corinthians 11:13 .— τὴν κατατομὴν , the concision ) A Paranomasia [See Append.]; for he claims for Christians the glorious name of the circumcision ( περιτομῆς ) in the following verse. The circumcision of the body was now useless, nay hurtful. See κατατέμνω on the prohibition of cutting the flesh, Leviticus 21:5 ; 1 Kings 18:28 . He speaks not without indignation. [29] Repetition of the same word at the beginnings of several clauses.—ED. [30] See , instead of avoid , which is its consequence.—ED. [31] So as to follow; not as here, See so as to avoid .—ED. [32] Εὐλαβοῦ τὴν κύνα , cave canem , used to be written near the door of ancient houses to guard strangers against the dog kept in the ostium or janua. At Pompeii, “in the house of the tragic poet,” there is wrought in the Mosaic pavement, “Cave canem,” and the figure of a fierce dog. See Gell’s Pomp.—ED
Pulpit Commentary — Pulpit Commentary — Philippians (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
Verse 2. - Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the concision . The connection is, as given in ver. 3, Rejoice in the Lord, not in the flesh; have confidence in him, not in the ceremonies of the Jewish Law. Compare the same contrast in Galatians 6:13, 14 . There is c...
Show full excerpt
Verse 2. - Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the concision . The connection is, as given in ver. 3, Rejoice in the Lord, not in the flesh; have confidence in him, not in the ceremonies of the Jewish Law. Compare the same contrast in Galatians 6:13, 14 . There is certainly something abrupt in the sudden introduction of this polemic against Judaizing, especially in writing to Philippi, where there were not many Jews. But there may have been circumstances, unknown to us, which made the warning necessary; or, as some think, the apostle may have written this under excitement caused by the violent opposition of the Jewish faction at Rome. Beware ; literally, mark , observe them, to be on your guard against them. The dogs. The article must be retained in the translation. The Jews called the Gentiles "dogs" (comp. Matthew 15:26, 27 ; Revelation 22:15 ), i.e. unclean, mainly because of their disregard of the distinction between clean and unclean food. St. Paul retorts the epithet: they are the dogs, who have confidence in the flesh, not in spiritual religion. Evil workers ; so 2 Corinthians 11:13 , where he calls them "deceitful workers." The Judaizers were active enough, like the Pharisees who "compassed sea and land to make one proselyte;" but their activity sprang from bad motives - they were evil workers, though their work was sometimes overruled for good (comp. Philippians 1:15-18 ).

Commentary excerpts drawn from the Waymark library. Explore the full texts for deeper context.

© 2026 Waymark