words were later wrongly translated by ὑ ιος του ἀ νθρωπου and in Christian
apocalyptic, in connection with Daniel 7:13, were understood of the Messiah,
and in that meaning then were put into Jesus’ mouth. But this hypothesis is
nevertheless very improbable; it lacks any explanat...
Show full excerpt
words were later wrongly translated by ὑ ιος του ἀ νθρωπου and in Christian
apocalyptic, in connection with Daniel 7:13, were understood of the Messiah,
and in that meaning then were put into Jesus’ mouth. But this hypothesis is
nevertheless very improbable; it lacks any explanation of when and why the
Aramaic expression was thus rendered in Greek, was understood in a
Messianic sense, and without any reason was put into Jesus’ mouth, cf.
Schulze, Die Religion Jesu und der Glaube an Christus, Halle 1897 S. 7-13.
Fréd. Krop, La pensée de Jésus sur le royaume de Dieu 124 s. Kähler, Zur
Lehre v. d. Versöhnung, Leipzig 1898 S. 78. Rather it is probable that the
expression בר נוש already in Jewish apocalyptic designated the Messiah, or
that Jesus himself intentionally derived that title from Daniel, in order to
designate himself clearly and yet in another sense than his contemporaries
thought, as Messiah. In any case, Jesus calls himself so where, by his
humble life, Matthew 8:20, 11:19, by his serving, Matthew 20:28, by his seeking and
saving of the lost, Matthew 18:11, by his forgiveness of sins, Mark 2:10, by his
power over the Sabbath, Mark 2:18, by his suffering, Mark 8:31, 9:12, 31,
10:33, by his return, Mark 13:26, 14:62, he founds, extends and [237]
completes the kingdom of heaven on earth. With this claim and this name
Jesus did not first appear toward the end of his life; he was conscious of his
Messiahship from the first moment of his public activity onward and began