The gnostic interpretation of ἔγνω , which is contested by the Clementines ( Luke 18:13 f.), very easily brought about the change into the present tense. See (after Baur, Hilgenfeld, Semisch, Köstlin, Volkmar) Zeller, Apostelg . p. 13f. τίς ] in respect of His nature, counsel, wi...
Show full excerpt
The gnostic interpretation of ἔγνω , which is contested by the Clementines ( Luke 18:13 f.), very easily brought about the change into the present tense. See (after Baur, Hilgenfeld, Semisch, Köstlin, Volkmar) Zeller, Apostelg . p. 13f. τίς ] in respect of His nature, counsel, will, thought, etc. In what way, however, τίς ἐστιν ὁ πατήρ is said to be gnostic rather than biblical (Köstlin, p. 161) it is not easy to see. The Father who has sent the Son has His perfect revelation for the first time in Him. Comp. John 14:9 . ᾧ ἐὰν βούλ .] Comp. concerning the Spirit, 1 Corinthians 12:11 . This will of the Son, however, in virtue of His essential and moral unity with the Father, is no other than the Father’s will, which the Son has to fulfil. Comp. Gess, Pers. Chr. p. 18 f. Observe, again, that the negation, which is not to be relatively explained away, οὐδεὶς … εἰ μή , establishes a relation of a unique kind , namely, that of the metaphysical fellowship. [134] Keim, Geschichtl. Christus , p. 51, sees here the climax reached of the consciousness of the divine Sonship, and that hence there now appears, instead of the “ your Father ,” as hitherto, the designation “ my Father.” But on the one hand “ your Father” is still said at the same time and later ( Luke 12:30 ; Luke 12:32 ; Matthew 10:20 ; Matthew 18:14 ; Matthew 23:9 ), and on the other Jesus, not to mention Luke 2:49 , says “ my Father” even as early as in the Sermon on the Mount ( Matthew 7:21 ). Baur, indeed ( Neutest.