Joshua 11:22

Joshua 11:22

Commentary from the Reformed tradition and beyond

How we matched these sections:
PinpointedTouchesSemantically Found
Matthew Henry's Concise Commentary — Matthew Henry's Concise Commentary — Joshua (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
11:15-23 Never let the sons of Anak be a terror to the Israel of God, for their day to fall will come. The land rested from war. It ended not in a peace with the Canaanites, that was forbidden, but in a peace from them. There is a rest, a rest from war, remaining for the people o...
Show full excerpt
11:15-23 Never let the sons of Anak be a terror to the Israel of God, for their day to fall will come. The land rested from war. It ended not in a peace with the Canaanites, that was forbidden, but in a peace from them. There is a rest, a rest from war, remaining for the people of God, into which they shall enter, when their warfare is accomplished. That which was now done, is compared with what had been said to Moses. God's word and his works, if viewed together, will be found mutually to set each other forth. If we make conscience of our duty, we need not question the performance of the promise. But the believer must never put off his armour, or expect lasting peace, till he closes his eyes in death; nay, as his strength and usefulness increase, he may expect more heavy trials; yet the Lord will not permit any enemies to assault the believer till he has prepared him for the battle. Christ Jesus ever lives to plead for his people, and their faith shall not fail, however Satan may be permitted to assault them. And however tedious, sharp, and difficult the believer's warfare, his patience in tribulation may be encouraged by the joyfulness of hope; for he will, ere long, rest from sin and from sorrow in the Canaan above.
Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible — Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible — Joshua (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
There was none of the Anakims left in the land of the children of Israel,.... For those that escaped the sword fled elsewhere, particularly to the following places: only in Gaza, in Gath, and in Ashdod there remained; that is, some of the Anakims or giants; these were three of th...
Show full excerpt
There was none of the Anakims left in the land of the children of Israel,.... For those that escaped the sword fled elsewhere, particularly to the following places: only in Gaza, in Gath, and in Ashdod there remained; that is, some of the Anakims or giants; these were three of the five principalities of the Philistines, and were never conquered and possessed by Israel, see Joshua 13:3; of the city of Gaza; see Gill on Amos 1:7; See Gill on Amos 1:8; and See Gill on Zephaniah 2:4; and of Gath; see Gill on Amos 6:2; Ashdod is the same with Azotus; see Gill on Acts 8:40, Mela says (h), the port of Azotus was a mart for the merchandises of Arabia, and was built on such an eminence, that from the top of it, at the fourth watch, might be seen the rising of the sun at the mountain Azotus; see"Who discomfited the right wing, and pursued them unto the mount Azotus.'' (1 Maccabees 9:15)this city held out a siege of twenty nine years against Psammitticus, king of Egypt; see Gill on Isaiah 20:1. (h) De Situ Orbis, l. 1. c. 10.
Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers — Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers — Joshua (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
(22) Only in . . . Gath. -Goliath of Gath and his gigantic relatives (1 Samuel 17 and 2 Samuel 21) seem to have been a part of this remnant.
Benson Commentary — Benson Commentary — Joshua (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
Joshua 11:22 . Only in Gaza, in Gath, and in Ashdod — These were three cities of the Philistines, into which either some of the Anakims escaped, and there took shelter, or they had been there from ancient time, and the Israelites could not yet expel them. For they did not possess...
Show full excerpt
Joshua 11:22 . Only in Gaza, in Gath, and in Ashdod — These were three cities of the Philistines, into which either some of the Anakims escaped, and there took shelter, or they had been there from ancient time, and the Israelites could not yet expel them. For they did not possess themselves of the country of the Philistines till the time of David, when we find some of these giants still there.
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges — Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges — Joshua (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
22 . only in Gaza ] See above, Joshua 10:41 . in Gath ] One of the five royal cities of the Philistines ( Joshua 13:3 ; 1 Samuel 6:17 ), and the native place of the giant Goliath, who, though doubtless of the old stock of the Anakims ( 1 Samuel 17:4 ; 2 Samuel 21:18-20 ), is call...
Show full excerpt
22 . only in Gaza ] See above, Joshua 10:41 . in Gath ] One of the five royal cities of the Philistines ( Joshua 13:3 ; 1 Samuel 6:17 ), and the native place of the giant Goliath, who, though doubtless of the old stock of the Anakims ( 1 Samuel 17:4 ; 2 Samuel 21:18-20 ), is called a Philistine, shewing that in David’s time the two races had coalesced and become one. Gath occupied a strong position ( 2 Chronicles 11:8 ), on the border of Judah and Philistia ( 1 Samuel 21:10 ; 1 Chronicles 18:1 ) near Shoco and Adullam ( 2 Chronicles 11:8 ), and from its strength and resources formed the key of both countries. and in Ashdod ] Ashdod or Azotus ( Acts 8:40 ) was situated about 30 miles from the southern frontier of Palestine, three from the Mediterranean Sea, and nearly midway between Gaza and Joppa. It was assigned to the tribe of Judah ( Joshua 15:47 ), but was never subdued by the Israelites, and even down to Nehemiah’s age it preserved its distinctiveness of race and language ( Nehemiah 13:23-24 ). It was the city of Dagon ( 1 Samuel 5:1-7 ), and against it, as against Gaza, the prophets often direct their denunciations ( Jeremiah 25:20 ; Amos 1:8 ; Zephaniah 2:4 ; Zechariah 9:6 ).
Geneva Study Bible — Geneva Study Bible — Joshua (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
There was none of the Anakims left in the land of the children of Israel: only in Gaza, {m} in Gath, and in Ashdod, there remained. (m) Out of which came Goliath, 1Sa 17:4.
Matthew Poole's Commentary — Matthew Poole's Commentary — Joshua (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
Three cities of the Philistines, to which they retired, and where we find some of them afterwards, 1 Samuel 17:4 2 Samuel 21:16 ; which may be one reason why the Israelites durst not make an attempt upon these places, though they were a part of their possession.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary — Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary — Joshua (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
17. from the mount Halak—Hebrew, "the smooth mountain." that goeth up to Seir—an irregular line of white naked hills, about eighty feet high, and seven or eight geographical miles in length that cross the whole Ghor, eight miles south of the Dead Sea, probably "the ascent of Akra...
Show full excerpt
17. from the mount Halak—Hebrew, "the smooth mountain." that goeth up to Seir—an irregular line of white naked hills, about eighty feet high, and seven or eight geographical miles in length that cross the whole Ghor, eight miles south of the Dead Sea, probably "the ascent of Akrabbim" [Robinson]. unto Baal-gad in the valley of Lebanon—the city or temple of the god of destiny, in Baalbec.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible — Barnes' Notes on the Bible — Joshua (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
Gaza, Gath, Ashdod - See the Joshua 13:3 note.
Pulpit Commentary — Pulpit Commentary — Joshua (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
Verse 22. - Only in Gaza. This statement is confirmed by what we afterwards read. In Gath especially ( 1 Samuel 17:4 ; 2 Samuel 21:18-22 ; 1 Chronicles 20:4-8 , the last passage preserving the true text, which has become hopelessly corrupt in the second Book of Samuel) we find th...
Show full excerpt
Verse 22. - Only in Gaza. This statement is confirmed by what we afterwards read. In Gath especially ( 1 Samuel 17:4 ; 2 Samuel 21:18-22 ; 1 Chronicles 20:4-8 , the last passage preserving the true text, which has become hopelessly corrupt in the second Book of Samuel) we find the race of giants remaining till David's time. But it had almost died out. Goliath and his brethren seem to have been regarded by the Philistines, as much as by the Hebrews, in the light of prodigies. It may be that the race deteriorated in size and strength, when driven from the mountain district. Gaza (Hebrew Azzah, as in Deuteronomy 2:23 ; 1 Kings 4:24 ; Jeremiah 25:20 ) was a stronghold of the Philistines. We first find it mentioned as the border of Canaan in Genesis 10:19 . It was the scene of the exploits of Samson, related in Judges 16 . It, with Gath, Ekron, Ashdod, and Ashkelon, formed the five Philistine lordships mentioned in Joshua 13:5 . Gaza does not appear in the list of cities captured by David, although Gath does. Perhaps the strength of its position (Azzah signifies strength) may have enabled it to resist David and Solomon, whose dominions are said to have extended to, but not to have included, Azzah. We read little more of it in the Old Testament. Jeremiah says that Pharaoh smote it (Joshua 47:1); Amos and Zephaniah threatened it with punishment. It is mentioned in Acts 8:26 as a place of some importance.
Pulpit Commentary — Pulpit Commentary — Joshua (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
And it still exists, at about an hour's journey from the sea, and is now called Ghazzeh. (see also note on ver. 41). Gath. Also one of the five Philistine lordships. In David's time it had a king, with whom David took refuge ( 1 Samuel 21:10 ; 1 Samuel 27:2 ). It was afterwards c...
Show full excerpt
And it still exists, at about an hour's journey from the sea, and is now called Ghazzeh. (see also note on ver. 41). Gath. Also one of the five Philistine lordships. In David's time it had a king, with whom David took refuge ( 1 Samuel 21:10 ; 1 Samuel 27:2 ). It was afterwards conquered by David ( 2 Samuel 21:20 ; 1 Chronicles 18:1 ; 1 Chronicles 20:6 ). We find it in Solomon's jurisdiction, though under the government of one of its own royal family ( 1 Kings 2:39 ). Rehoboam fortified it ( 2 Chronicles 11:8 ). Hazael, the powerful king of Syria, wrested it from Jehoash, and was only bought air from assailing Jerusalem. Uzziah retook it once more ( 2 Chronicles 26:6 ). Hezekiah seems to have retained it ( 2 Kings 18:8 ). After this we hear no more of it. Modern travellers and commentators have identified it with Beit-Jibrin (the house of the mighty - perhaps a reminiscence of Goliath and his kindred), now Eleutheropolis (so Knobel). Others suppose it to be the Blanche Garde of the Crusaders, or Tell-es-Safieh, an opinion supported, among others, by Mr. J. L. Porter and Lieut. Conder. See, however, the note on Libnah, Joshua 10:29 . Ashdod. Later Azotus, now Esdud. Here the ark was carried after the disastrous defeat related in 1 Samuel 4 . It was conquered by Uzziah (no doubt it had formerly been reduced by David), who built forts to overawe it ( 2 Chronicles 26:6 ), but it fell into the hands of Sargon, king of Assyria, a little later ( Isaiah 20:1 ).

Commentary excerpts drawn from the Waymark library. Explore the full texts for deeper context.

© 2026 Waymark