But Christ was not first adopted as Son of God as a king under Israel in
time. He is not called God’s Son on account of his supernatural birth, as the
Socinians taught and Hofmann, Schriftbeweis I 116 f. still tries to argue.
Nor does He bear that name in an ethical sense, as man...
Show full excerpt
But Christ was not first adopted as Son of God as a king under Israel in
time. He is not called God’s Son on account of his supernatural birth, as the
Socinians taught and Hofmann, Schriftbeweis I 116 f. still tries to argue.
Nor does He bear that name in an ethical sense, as many think, Weiss, Bibl.
Theol. § 17. Ritschl, Rechtf. u. Vers. II2 97. Scholten, L. H. K. II 206 e. a.
Nor did He first become it through his mediatorship and his resurrection,
for which one appeals to John 10:34-36, Hand. 13:32, 33, Romans 1:4. But He
is Son of God in the metaphysical sense, by nature and from eternity. He is
highly exalted above angels and prophets, Matthew 13:32, 21:27, 22:2, and
stands in an entirely unique relation to God, Matthew 11:27. He is the beloved
Son, in whom the Father has his good pleasure, Matthew 3:17, 17:5, Mark 1:11,
the own Son, Romans 8:32, the eternal Son, John 17:5, 24, Hebr. 1:5, 5:5, to
whom the Father gave ζωην ἐ χειν ἐ ν ἑ αυτ ῳ , John 5:26, who is like the
Father in knowledge, Matthew 11:27, in honor, John 5:23, in power in creation
and re-creation, John 1:3, 5:21, 27, in activity, John 10:30, in dominion, Mt.
this his Sonship has been condemned to death, John 10:33, Matthew 26:63 v.
In the third place, the name Image of God is also discussed here. The
human being can indeed be so called by analogy, but Christ is so in the
absolute sense. He was, before his incarnation, as Logos, as Son, Romans 1:3,