Revelation 21:16 , note, “The city lieth four-square,” etc.— εἰσίν , there are ) already now , and from the beginning.— εἰ δὲ μή , but if it were not so ) If there were not already [many mansions].— εἷπον ἄν ) I would tell , or rather, I would have told you. Concerning the pluper...
Show full excerpt
Revelation 21:16 , note, “The city lieth four-square,” etc.— εἰσίν , there are ) already now , and from the beginning.— εἰ δὲ μή , but if it were not so ) If there were not already [many mansions].— εἷπον ἄν ) I would tell , or rather, I would have told you. Concerning the pluperfect, comp. ch. John 4:10 , note [ σὺ ἂν ᾔτησας — καὶ ἔδωκεν ἄν ]. “What would He have told them? This very thing, which follows, πορεύομαι , I go . Parodying [an adaptation of] the very similar passage, ch. John 16:26 , illustrates the sentiment here: I have not said to you, that I would prepare a place for you; for already there ARE mansions, and those numerous .— πορεύομαι , I go ) to the home of My Father.— ἑτοιμάσαι , to prepare ) He does not altogether deny that He prepares the place, with which comp. the following verse, where He Himself affirms it: but each of the two statements mutually qualifies the other. But see, what force there may lie in the order of the words: in John 14:2 it is said, τόπον ὑμῖν , a place for you ; in John 14:3 , ὑμῖν τόπον , for you a place : the first word in each instance respectively containing the emphasis, as in 1 Corinthians 7:22 , note [ κληθεὶς — ἀπελεύθερος ,— ἐλεύθερος κληθείς ]. The place itself is already prepared: but for you it has yet to be prepared. The one preparation is absolute, the other relative. The beginning of the third verse, καὶ ἐάν , and if , does not depend on εἶπον , I would have told you, but stands by itself.