Exodus 34:2

Exodus 34:2

Commentary from the Reformed tradition and beyond

How we matched these sections:
PinpointedTouchesSemantically Found
Matthew Henry's Concise Commentary — Matthew Henry's Concise Commentary — Exodus (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
34:1-4 When God made man in his own image, the moral law was written in his heart, by the finger of God, without outward means. But since the covenant then made with man was broken, the Lord has used the ministry of men, both in writing the law in the Scriptures, and in writing i...
Show full excerpt
34:1-4 When God made man in his own image, the moral law was written in his heart, by the finger of God, without outward means. But since the covenant then made with man was broken, the Lord has used the ministry of men, both in writing the law in the Scriptures, and in writing it in the heart. When God was reconciled to the Israelites, he ordered the tables to be renewed, and wrote his law in them. Even under the gospel of peace by Christ, the moral law continues to bind believers. Though Christ has redeemed us from the curse of the law, yet not from the commands of it. The first and the best evidence of the pardon of sin, and peace with God, is the writing the law in the heart.
Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible — Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible — Exodus (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
And be ready in the morning,.... This was, according to the Jewish chronology (e), on the twenty eighth day of the month Ab or July: and come up in the morning unto Mount Sinai; the same mount where he had been before: and present thyself there to me on the top of the mount; wher...
Show full excerpt
And be ready in the morning,.... This was, according to the Jewish chronology (e), on the twenty eighth day of the month Ab or July: and come up in the morning unto Mount Sinai; the same mount where he had been before: and present thyself there to me on the top of the mount; where the pillar of cloud removed and stood, and near it Moses was to stand and wait to hear what would be said unto him, and to see what would be made to pass before him. (e) Seder Olam Rabba, c. 6. p. 19.
Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers — Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers — Exodus (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
(2) Be ready in the morning. —It was necessary to allow an interval for the hewing of the stones. In the top of the mount—i.e., in the same place as before. (Comp. Exodus 19:20; Exodus 24:12; Exodus 24:18.)
Geneva Study Bible — Geneva Study Bible — Exodus (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
And be ready in the morning, and come up in the morning unto mount Sinai, and present thyself there to me in the top of the mount.
Matthew Poole's Commentary — Matthew Poole's Commentary — Exodus (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
No text from Poole on this verse.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible — Barnes' Notes on the Bible — Exodus (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
Hew thee - The former tables are called "the work of God;" compare Exodus 32:16 . The words - See Exodus 34:28.
Pulpit Commentary — Pulpit Commentary — Exodus (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
Verse 2. - Be ready in the morning . An interval was required for the hewing of the tables. It was made as short as possible. In the top of the mount. Where he had been with God previously ( Exodus 19:20 ; Exodus 24:12, 18 ). Exodus 34:2
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges — Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges — Exodus (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
2 . be ready ] Cf. Exodus 19:10 . station thyself for me ] The same word as in Exodus 33:21 . the top of the mount ] Exodus 19:20 , Exodus 24:17 .
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary — Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary — Exodus (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
2. present thyself … to me in the top of the mount—Not absolutely the highest peak; for as the cloud of the Shekinah usually abode on the summit, and yet (Ex 34:5) it "descended," the plain inference is that Moses was to station himself at a point not far distant, but still below...
Show full excerpt
2. present thyself … to me in the top of the mount—Not absolutely the highest peak; for as the cloud of the Shekinah usually abode on the summit, and yet (Ex 34:5) it "descended," the plain inference is that Moses was to station himself at a point not far distant, but still below the loftiest pinnacle.
Keil and Delitzsch Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament — Keil and Delitzsch Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament — Exodus (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
When Moses had restored the covenant bond through his intercession ( Exodus 33:14 ), he was directed by Jehovah to hew out two stones, like the former ones which he had broken, and to come with them the next morning up the mountain, and Jehovah would write upon them the same word...
Show full excerpt
When Moses had restored the covenant bond through his intercession ( Exodus 33:14 ), he was directed by Jehovah to hew out two stones, like the former ones which he had broken, and to come with them the next morning up the mountain, and Jehovah would write upon them the same words as upon the first, (Note: Namely, the ten words in Exodus 20:2-17, not the laws contained in Exodus 34:12-26 of this chapter, as Gthe and Hitzig suppose. See Hengstenberg, Dissertations ii. p. 319, and Kurtz on the Old Covenant iii.182ff.) and thus restore the covenant record. It was also commanded, as in the former case (Exodus 19:12-13), that no one should go up the mountain with him, or be seen upon it, and that not even cattle should feed against the mountain, i.e., in the immediate neighbourhood (Exodus 34:3). The first tables of the covenant were called "tables of stone" (Exodus 24:12; Exodus 31:18); the second, on the other hand, which were hewn by Moses, are called "tables of stones" (Exodus 34:1 and Exodus 34:4); and the latter expression is applied indiscriminately to both of them in Deuteronomy 4:13; Deuteronomy 5:19; Deuteronomy 9:9-11; Deuteronomy 10:1-4.
Keil and Delitzsch Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament — Keil and Delitzsch Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament — Exodus (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
This difference does not indicate a diversity in the records, but may be explained very simply from the fact, that the tables prepared by Moses were hewn from two stones, and not both from the same block; whereas all that could be said of the former, which had been made by God Hi...
Show full excerpt
This difference does not indicate a diversity in the records, but may be explained very simply from the fact, that the tables prepared by Moses were hewn from two stones, and not both from the same block; whereas all that could be said of the former, which had been made by God Himself, was that they were of stone, since no one knew whether God had used one stone or two for the purpose. There is apparently far more importance in the following distinction, that the second tables were delivered by Moses and only written upon by God, whereas in the case of the former both the writing and the materials came from God. This cannot have been intended either as a punishment for the nation (Hengstenberg), or as "the sign of a higher stage of the covenant, inasmuch as the further the reciprocity extended, the firmer was the covenant" (Baumgarten). It is much more natural to seek for the cause, as Rashi does, in the fact, that Moses had broken the first in pieces; only we must not regard it as a sign that God disapproved of the manifestation of anger on the part of Moses, but rather as a recognition of his zealous exertions for the restoration of the covenant which had been broken by the sin of the nation. As Moses had restored the covenant through his energetic intercession, he should also provide the materials for the renewal of the covenant record, and bring them to God, for Him to complete and confirm the record by writing the covenant words upon the tables.

Commentary excerpts drawn from the Waymark library. Explore the full texts for deeper context.

© 2026 Waymark