"And I praised the dead who were long ago dead, more than the living who are yet in life; and as happier than both, him who has not yet come into existence, who hath not seen the evil work which is done under the sun." ושׁבּח is hardly thought of as part., like יוּקשׁים equals מי...
Show full excerpt
"And I praised the dead who were long ago dead, more than the living who are yet in life; and as happier than both, him who has not yet come into existence, who hath not seen the evil work which is done under the sun." ושׁבּח is hardly thought of as part., like יוּקשׁים equals מיקּשׁים, Ecclesiastes 9:12 ; the m of the part. Pih. is not usually thrown away, only מהר, Zephaniah 1:14 , is perhaps equals ממהר, but for the same reason as בּית־אל, 2 Kings 2:3 , is equals בּבית - אל. Thus ושׁבּח, like ונתון, Ecclesiastes 8:9 , is inf. absol., which is used to continue, in an adverbially subord. manner, the preceding finite with the same subject, (Note: Also 1 Chronicles 5:20, the subject remains virtually the same: et ita quidem ut exaudirentur.) Genesis 41:43; Leviticus 25:14; Judges 7:19, etc.; cf. especially Exodus 8:11 : "Pharaoh saw ... and hardened (והכבּד) his heart;" just in the same manner as ושׁבּח here connects itself with ושׁ אני וא. Only the annexed designation of the subject is peculiar; the syntactic possibility of this connection is established by Psalm 15:5, Job 40:2, and, in the second rank, by Genesis 17:10; Ezekiel 5:14. Yet אני might well enough have been omitted had וש אני וא not stood too remote. Regarding עדנה (Note: Thus punctuated with Segol under Daleth, and ,נ raphatum, in F. H. J. P. Thus also Kimchi in W.B. under עד.) and עדן.