But Koheleth's contention is, not that there is no law or order in what happens to man, but that neither man nor beast can dispose events at their own will and pleasure; they are conditioned by a force superior to them, which dominates their actions, sufferings, and circumstances...
Show full excerpt
But Koheleth's contention is, not that there is no law or order in what happens to man, but that neither man nor beast can dispose events at their own will and pleasure; they are conditioned by a force superior to them, which dominates their actions, sufferings, and circumstances of life. As the one dieth, so dieth the other . In the matter of succumbing to the law of death man has no superiority over other creatures. This is an inference drawn from common observation of exterior facts, and touches not any higher question (comp. Ecclesiastes 2:14, 15 ; Ecclesiastes 9:2, 3 ). Something similar is found in Psalm 49:20 , " Man that is in honor, and understandeth not, is like the beasts that perish." Yea, they have all one breath ( ruach ). This is the word used in ver. 23 for the vital principle, "the breath of life," as it is called in Genesis 6:17 , where the same word is found. In the earlier record ( Genesis 2:7 ) the term is nishma . Life in all animals is regarded as the gift of God. Says the psalmist, "Thou sendest forth thy spirit ( ruach ), they are created" ( Psalm 104:30 ). This lower principle presents the same phenomena in men and in brutes. Man hath no pre-eminence above a beast ; i . e . in regard to suffering and death. This is not bare materialism, or a gloomy deduction from Greek teaching, but must be explained from the writer's standpoint, which is to emphasize the impotence of man to effect his own happiness.