Hence he is represented here as coming forth from among them to manifest himself to his people. A fiery law . There is a various reading here; instead of אֵשׁ םדּת , fire of law, many codices have אשׁדת in one word, and this is supported by the Samaritan text and other authoritie...
Show full excerpt
Hence he is represented here as coming forth from among them to manifest himself to his people. A fiery law . There is a various reading here; instead of אֵשׁ םדּת , fire of law, many codices have אשׁדת in one word, and this is supported by the Samaritan text and other authorities, and is accepted by most critics and interpreters. It is a fatal objection to the textual reading that דַּת is not a Semitic word, but one of Persian origin, brought by the Jews from Babylonia, and found only in the post-exilian books ( Esther 1:8, 19 ; Esther 2:8, 12 ; Esther 3:8, 14 ; Esther 4:11, 15 ; Ezra 7:12, 21 ; Ezra 8:36 ; Daniel 2:9, 13, 15 ; Daniel 6:5, 9, 13, 16 ); and in them as applied to the Law of God only by heathens. It is, therefore, altogether improbable that this word should be found in any Hebrew writing anterior to the Captivity. Besides, what is the sense of אֵשׁ דַּת , supposing דת to mean "law?" The words cannot be rendered, as in the Authorized Version, by "fiery law;" they can only be rendered by "a fire, a law," or "a fire of law," and What either of these may mean it is not easy to see. The ancient versions vary here very considerably: LXX., ἐκ δεξιῶν αὐτοῦ ἄγγελοι μετ αὐτοῦ : Vulgate, fin dextera ejus ignea lex ; Targum of Onkelos, "Written by his right hand, from the midst of the fire, a law gave he to us;" Syriac, "With myriads of his saints at his right hand.