Acts 4:14

Acts 4:14

Commentary from the Reformed tradition and beyond

How we matched these sections:
PinpointedTouchesSemantically Found
Matthew Henry's Concise Commentary — Matthew Henry's Concise Commentary — Acts (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
4:5-14 Peter being filled with the Holy Ghost, would have all to understand, that the miracle had been wrought by the name, or power, of Jesus of Nazareth, the Messiah, whom they had crucified; and this confirmed their testimony to his resurrection from the dead, which proved him...
Show full excerpt
4:5-14 Peter being filled with the Holy Ghost, would have all to understand, that the miracle had been wrought by the name, or power, of Jesus of Nazareth, the Messiah, whom they had crucified; and this confirmed their testimony to his resurrection from the dead, which proved him to be the Messiah. These rulers must either be saved by that Jesus whom they had crucified, or they must perish for ever. The name of Jesus is given to men of every age and nation, as that whereby alone believers are saved from the wrath to come. But when covetousness, pride, or any corrupt passion, rules within, men shut their eyes, and close their hearts, in enmity against the light; considering all as ignorant and unlearned, who desire to know nothing in comparison with Christ crucified. And the followers of Christ should act so that all who converse with them, may take knowledge that they have been with Jesus. That makes them holy, heavenly, spiritual, and cheerful, and raises them above this world.
Matthew Poole's Commentary — Matthew Poole's Commentary — Acts (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
Standing; whereas, before he was either carried, or was forced to lay down. They could say nothing against it; they could not deny but that it was a good deed, and that it was miraculously done.
Bengel's Gnomen — Bengel's Gnomen — Acts (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
Acts 4:14 . Σὺν αὐτοῖς , with them ) viz. with Peter and John.— ἕστωτα , standing ) with firm ankle.— οὐδὲν εἶχον , they had nothing ) although they were wishing it: Acts 4:21 . They themselves say, we cannot : Acts 4:16 .
Geneva Study Bible — Geneva Study Bible — Acts (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
And beholding the man which was healed standing with them, they could say nothing against it.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary — Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary — Acts (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
13-17. perceived that they were unlearned and ignorant men—that is, uninstructed in the learning of the Jewish schools, and of the common sort; men in private life, untrained to teaching. took knowledge of them that they had been with Jesus—recognized them as having been in His c...
Show full excerpt
13-17. perceived that they were unlearned and ignorant men—that is, uninstructed in the learning of the Jewish schools, and of the common sort; men in private life, untrained to teaching. took knowledge of them that they had been with Jesus—recognized them as having been in His company; remembering possibly, that they had seen them with Him [Meyer, Bloomfield, Alford]; but, more probably, perceiving in their whole bearing what identified them with Jesus: that is, "We thought we had got rid of Him; but lo! He reappears in these men, and all that troubled us in the Nazarene Himself has yet to be put down in these His disciples." What a testimony to these primitive witnesses! Would that the same could be said of their successors!
Pulpit Commentary — Pulpit Commentary — Acts (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
Verse 14. - Beholding for seeing , A.V. Acts 4:14
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges — Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges — Acts (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
14 . It has been asked on this verse: Why the sight of the healed man so utterly confounded the judges that they had not a word to say. We may see from what happened afterwards that there were men in the council not without the thought that God was really working through the Apos...
Show full excerpt
14 . It has been asked on this verse: Why the sight of the healed man so utterly confounded the judges that they had not a word to say. We may see from what happened afterwards that there were men in the council not without the thought that God was really working through the Apostles. Gamaliel says ( Acts 5:39 ) “If this work be of God,” and if this feeling operated in him, the recognized head of the Jewish court, it is not unlikely that others were silent with the consideration that “haply they might be fighting against God.”
Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers — Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers — Acts (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
(14) They could say nothing against it. —Literally, they had nothing to say against it.
MacLaren's Expositions — MacLaren's Expositions — Acts (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
Acts THE FIRST BLAST OF TEMPESTActs 4:1 - Acts 4:14 . Hitherto the Jewish authorities had let the disciples alone, either because their attention had not been drawn even by Pentecost and the consequent growth of the Church, or because they thought that to ignore the new sect was ...
Show full excerpt
Acts THE FIRST BLAST OF TEMPESTActs 4:1 - Acts 4:14 . Hitherto the Jewish authorities had let the disciples alone, either because their attention had not been drawn even by Pentecost and the consequent growth of the Church, or because they thought that to ignore the new sect was the best way to end it. But when its leaders took to vehement preaching in Solomon’s porch, and crowds eagerly listened, it was time to strike in. Our passage describes the first collision of hostile authority with Christian faith, and shows, as in a glass, the constant result of that collision in all ages. The motives actuating the assailants are significantly analysed, and may be distributed among the three classes enumerated. The priests and the captain of the Temple would be annoyed by the very fact that Peter and John taught the people: the former, because they were jealous of their official prerogative: the latter, because he was responsible for public order, and a riot in the Temple court would have been a scandal. The Saddueees were indignant at the substance of the teaching, which affirmed the resurrection of the dead, which they denied, and alleged it as having occurred ‘in Jesus.’ The position of Sadducees and Pharisees is inverted in Acts as compared with the Gospels.
MacLaren's Expositions — MacLaren's Expositions — Acts (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
While Christ lived, the Pharisees were the soul of the opposition to Him, and His most solemn warnings fell on them; after the Resurrection, the Sadducees head the opposition, and among the Pharisees are some, like Gamaliel and afterwards Paul, who incline to the new faith. It wa...
Show full excerpt
While Christ lived, the Pharisees were the soul of the opposition to Him, and His most solemn warnings fell on them; after the Resurrection, the Sadducees head the opposition, and among the Pharisees are some, like Gamaliel and afterwards Paul, who incline to the new faith. It was the Resurrection that made the difference, and the difference is an incidental testimony to the fact that Christ’s Resurrection was proclaimed from the first. To ask whether Jesus had risen, and to examine the evidence, were the last things of which the combined assailants thought. This public activity of the Apostles threatened their influence or their pet beliefs, and so, like persecutors in all ages, they shut their eyes to the important question, ‘Is this preaching true or false?’ and took the easier course of laying hands on the preachers. So the night fell on Peter and John in prison, the first of the thousands who have suffered bonds and imprisonment for Christ, and have therein found liberty. What lofty faith, and what subordination of the fate of the messengers to the progress of the message, are expressed in that abrupt introduction, in Acts 4:4 , of the statistics of the increase of the Church from that day’s work! It mattered little that it ended with the two Apostles in custody, since it ended too with five thousand rejoicing in Christ.

Commentary excerpts drawn from the Waymark library. Explore the full texts for deeper context.

© 2026 Waymark