Acts 4:11 . οὗτος : “He, as in R.V. All E.V[152] previously translated it “this,” referring it to ὁ λίθος , but in the next verse a person is directly spoken of, not under the metaphor of a stone, and the pronoun finds its subject better in the ἐν τούτῳ , masculine of Acts 4:10 ....
Show full excerpt
Acts 4:11 . οὗτος : “He, as in R.V. All E.V[152] previously translated it “this,” referring it to ὁ λίθος , but in the next verse a person is directly spoken of, not under the metaphor of a stone, and the pronoun finds its subject better in the ἐν τούτῳ , masculine of Acts 4:10 . See Winer-Schmiedel, p. 216.— ὁ ἐξουθενηθεὶς : in the LXX and in the Gospels the word used is ἀπεδοκίμασαν . St. Peter, quoting apparently from memory, used a word expressing still greater contempt. It is used, e.g. , very significantly by St. Luke in his Gospel, Acts 23:11 , and again in Acts 18:9 . The word is found in none of the other Gospels, and is characteristic of St. Luke and of St. Paul ( cf. Romans 14:3 ; Romans 14:10 , 1 Corinthians 1:28 , 1 Corinthians 6:4 , etc.). It occurs several times in the LXX; cf. Wis 3:11 ; Wis 4:18 , Sir 19:1 , 2Ma 1:27 , and Psalms of Solomon , Acts 2:5 . In classical writers it is not found at all.— ὁ γενόμ . εἰς , “which was made,” R.V. Blass compares the Hebrew phrase הָיָהלְ and finds parallels in Acts 5:36 , Luke 13:19 , but γίγνεσθαι εἰς , while common in the LXX, is a correct expression in classical Greek, although the places in the N.T. in which the formula is found in O.T. quotations are undoubtedly Hebraisms (see below on Acts 5:36 ), Winer-Schmiedel, p. 257, and with this may be connected the frequency of its occurrence in the Apocalypse (see Simcox on the phrase, Language of the N.