Acts 26:5

Acts 26:5

Commentary from the Reformed tradition and beyond

How we matched these sections:
PinpointedTouchesSemantically Found
Matthew Henry's Concise Commentary — Matthew Henry's Concise Commentary — Acts (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
26:1-11 Christianity teaches us to give a reason of the hope that is in us, and also to give honour to whom honour is due, without flattery or fear of man. Agrippa was well versed in the Scriptures of the Old Testament, therefore could the better judge as to the controversy about...
Show full excerpt
26:1-11 Christianity teaches us to give a reason of the hope that is in us, and also to give honour to whom honour is due, without flattery or fear of man. Agrippa was well versed in the Scriptures of the Old Testament, therefore could the better judge as to the controversy about Jesus being the Messiah. Surely ministers may expect, when they preach the faith of Christ, to be heard patiently. Paul professes that he still kept to all the good in which he was first educated and trained up. See here what his religion was. He was a moralist, a man of virtue, and had not learned the arts of the crafty, covetous Pharisees; he was not chargeable with any open vice and profaneness. He was sound in the faith. He always had a holy regard for the ancient promise made of God unto the fathers, and built his hope upon it. The apostle knew very well that all this would not justify him before God, yet he knew it was for his reputation among the Jews, and an argument that he was not such a man as they represented him to be. Though he counted this but loss, that he might win Christ, yet he mentioned it when it might serve to honour Christ. See here what Paul's religion is; he has not such zeal for the ceremonial law as he had in his youth; the sacrifices and offerings appointed by that, are done away by the great Sacrifice which they typified.
Matthew Henry's Concise Commentary — Matthew Henry's Concise Commentary — Acts (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
Of the ceremonial cleansings he makes no conscience, and thinks the Levitical priesthood is done away in the priesthood of Christ; but, as to the main principles of his religion, he is as zealous as ever. Christ and heaven, are the two great doctrines of the gospel; that God has ...
Show full excerpt
Of the ceremonial cleansings he makes no conscience, and thinks the Levitical priesthood is done away in the priesthood of Christ; but, as to the main principles of his religion, he is as zealous as ever. Christ and heaven, are the two great doctrines of the gospel; that God has given to us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. These are the matter of the promise made unto the fathers. The temple service, or continual course of religious duties, day and night, was kept up as the profession of faith in the promise of eternal life, and in expectation of it. The prospect of eternal life should engage us to be diligent and stedfast in all religious exercises. Yet the Sadducees hated Paul for preaching the resurrection; and the other Jews joined them, because he testified that Jesus was risen, and was the promised Redeemer of Israel. Many things are thought to be beyond belief, only because the infinite nature and perfections of Him that has revealed, performed, or promised them, are overlooked. Paul acknowledged, that while he continued a Pharisee, he was a bitter enemy to Christianity. This was his character and manner of life in the beginning of his time; and there was every thing to hinder his being a Christian. Those who have been most strict in their conduct before conversion, will afterwards see abundant reason for humbling themselves, even on account of things which they then thought ought to have been done.
Matthew Poole's Commentary — Matthew Poole's Commentary — Acts (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
This heresy, sect, opinion, or way of the Pharisees, St. Paul rigthly commends, if we consider it comparatively with the other sects of the Sadducees and Essenes: he had called this before, Acts 22:3 , the most exact manner of the law of the fathers; for it is certain it was more...
Show full excerpt
This heresy, sect, opinion, or way of the Pharisees, St. Paul rigthly commends, if we consider it comparatively with the other sects of the Sadducees and Essenes: he had called this before, Acts 22:3 , the most exact manner of the law of the fathers; for it is certain it was more learned and strict, and came nigher to the truth in many things, than the other did.
Bengel's Gnomen — Bengel's Gnomen — Acts (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
Acts 26:5 . Προγινώσκοντες ) knowing me, before that I speak.— ἐὰν θέλωσι , if they be willing ) But they were unwilling [to testify], because they were sensible that in the conversion of Paul, even in respect to his previous life, there is the most effectual argument for the tru...
Show full excerpt
Acts 26:5 . Προγινώσκοντες ) knowing me, before that I speak.— ἐὰν θέλωσι , if they be willing ) But they were unwilling [to testify], because they were sensible that in the conversion of Paul, even in respect to his previous life, there is the most effectual argument for the truth of the Christian faith.
Geneva Study Bible — Geneva Study Bible — Acts (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
Which {a} knew me from {b} the beginning, if they would testify, that after the {c} most straitest sect of our religion I lived a Pharisee. (a) That I was, and where, and how I lived. (b) That my parents were Pharisees. (c) The sect of the Pharisees was the most exquisite amongst...
Show full excerpt
Which {a} knew me from {b} the beginning, if they would testify, that after the {c} most straitest sect of our religion I lived a Pharisee. (a) That I was, and where, and how I lived. (b) That my parents were Pharisees. (c) The sect of the Pharisees was the most exquisite amongst all the sects of the Jews, for it was better than all the rest.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary — Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary — Acts (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
5. if they would—"were willing to" testify—but this, of course, they were not, it being a strong point in his favor. after the most straitest—"the strictest." sect—as the Pharisees confessedly were. This was said to meet the charge, that as a Hellenistic Jew he had contracted amo...
Show full excerpt
5. if they would—"were willing to" testify—but this, of course, they were not, it being a strong point in his favor. after the most straitest—"the strictest." sect—as the Pharisees confessedly were. This was said to meet the charge, that as a Hellenistic Jew he had contracted among the heathen lax ideas of Jewish peculiarities.
Pulpit Commentary — Pulpit Commentary — Acts (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
Verse 5. - Having knowledge of me from the first for which knew me from the beginning , A.V.; be willing to for would , A.V.; how that for that , A.V.; straitest for most straitest , A.V. Straitest ( ἀκριβεστάτην ); see Acts 22:3 ; Acts 18:26 , etc. Sect ( αἵρεσις ); see Acts 24:...
Show full excerpt
Verse 5. - Having knowledge of me from the first for which knew me from the beginning , A.V.; be willing to for would , A.V.; how that for that , A.V.; straitest for most straitest , A.V. Straitest ( ἀκριβεστάτην ); see Acts 22:3 ; Acts 18:26 , etc. Sect ( αἵρεσις ); see Acts 24:14 , note. He does not disclaim being still a Pharisee. On the contrary, in the next verse (ver. 6) he declares, as he had done in Acts 23:6 , that it was for the chief hope of the Pharisees that he was now accused. He tries to enlist all the good feeling that ye t remained among the Jews on his side. Acts 26:5
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges — Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges — Acts (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
5 . which knew me from the beginnings if they would testify ] Better (with Rev. Ver. ) “having knowledge of me from the first, if they be willing to testify.” The word for “from the first” is the same which St Luke uses ( Luke 1:3 ) to indicate his perfect understanding of the Go...
Show full excerpt
5 . which knew me from the beginnings if they would testify ] Better (with Rev. Ver. ) “having knowledge of me from the first, if they be willing to testify.” The word for “from the first” is the same which St Luke uses ( Luke 1:3 ) to indicate his perfect understanding of the Gospel story “from the very first.” When we remember that the early part of his Gospel can hardly have been gathered from anybody but the Virgin Mary, who alone could know many of the details, we may well think that the word implies that St Paul had been known from his very childhood. The rest of the sentence seems to intimate that there were some among those who were now his accusers who could give evidence about his previous years if they were so minded. the most straitest ] There is nothing in the Greek to warrant the double superlative. Read “straitest.” sect ] The word is that which is rendered “heresy” by the A. V. in Acts 24:14 . Everywhere else in the Acts it is sect . In the Epistles, where the plural only occurs, it is “heresies.” our religion ] The word refers more especially to the outward ceremonials of worship, such as those by which the Pharisees were specially distinguished.
Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers — Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers — Acts (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
(5) After the most straitest sect. —Better, most rigid, or most precise. The Greek does not contain anything answering to the double superlative of the English. The word for “sect” is the same as that used in Acts 24:5 , and translated “heresy” in Acts 24:14 .
Barnes' Notes on the Bible — Barnes' Notes on the Bible — Acts (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
Which knew me - Who were well acquainted with me. From the beginning - ἄνωθεν anōthen. Formerly; or from the very commencement of my career. Who were perfectly apprised of my whole course. If they would testify - If they would bear witness to what they know. That after the mos...
Show full excerpt
Which knew me - Who were well acquainted with me. From the beginning - ἄνωθεν anōthen. Formerly; or from the very commencement of my career. Who were perfectly apprised of my whole course. If they would testify - If they would bear witness to what they know. That after the most straitest - The most rigid; the most strict, not only in regard to the written Law of God, but to the traditions of the elders. Paul himself elsewhere testifies Philippians 3:4-6 that he had enjoyed all the advantages of birth and training in the Jewish religion, and that he had early distinguished himself by his observance of its rites and customs. Sect - Division or party. I lived a Pharisee - I lived in accordance with the rules and doctrines of the Pharisees. See the notes on Matthew 3:7. The reasons why Paul here refers to his early life are: (1) As he had lived during the early period of his life without crime; as his principles had been settled by the instruction of the most able of their teachers, it was to be presumed that his subsequent life had been of a similar character. (2) as he, at that period of his life, evinced the utmost zeal for the laws and customs of his country, it was to be presumed that he would not be found opposing or reviling them at any subsequent period. From the strictness and conscientiousness of his past life, he supposed that Agrippa might argue favorably respecting his subsequent conduct.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible — Barnes' Notes on the Bible — Acts (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
A virtuous and religious course in early life is usually a sure pledge of virtue and integrity in subsequent years.
Expositor's Greek Testament — Expositor's Greek Testament — Acts (BibleHub)
Pinpointed
Acts 26:5 . προγιν . με : knowing me beforehand, i.e. , ἄνωθεν , from the beginning of my public education in Jerusalem. προγ .: twice elsewhere by Paul, Romans 8:29 ; Romans 11:2 , also in 1 Peter 1:20 , 2 Peter 3:17 . For ἀπʼ ἀρχῆς and ἅνωθεν cf. Luke 1:2-3 , and for the former...
Show full excerpt
Acts 26:5 . προγιν . με : knowing me beforehand, i.e. , ἄνωθεν , from the beginning of my public education in Jerusalem. προγ .: twice elsewhere by Paul, Romans 8:29 ; Romans 11:2 , also in 1 Peter 1:20 , 2 Peter 3:17 . For ἀπʼ ἀρχῆς and ἅνωθεν cf. Luke 1:2-3 , and for the former also 2 Thessalonians 2:13 .— ἀκριβ .: “the straitest sect,” R.V., on the double accusative in A.V. see Humphry, Commentary on R.V. For this classical form, the only instance of a superlative in - τατος in N.T., see especially Blass, u. s. , cf. Acts 26:4 ; on the term in its close connection with Pharisaism cf. Jos., B.J. , i., 5, 2; Ant. , xvii., 2, 4, and references above on Acts 22:3 . Their “straitness” included not only observance and interpretation of the Mosaic law, but also of the whole παράδοσις τῶν πρεσβυτέρων .— αἵρεσιγ , see on Acts 5:17 , the word in the sense of “a sect” was rightly applied to the exclusiveness of Pharisaism as in the N.T., cf. Acts 15:5 , and in Jos., cf. Vita , 38.— θρησκείας : “ cultus religionis , potissimum externus ,” Grimm, so here and in the other places where it occurs in N.T., Colossians 2:18 , Jam 1:26-27 ; twice in Wisdom, Wis 14:18 ; Wis 14:27 , of the worship of idols; in Sir 22:5 the reading is doubtful; in 4Ma 5:6; 4Ma 5:13, of the religion of the Jews. The instances of its use both in Philo and Josephus show that it was plainly, distinguished from εὐσεβεία and ὁσιότης .

Commentary excerpts drawn from the Waymark library. Explore the full texts for deeper context.

© 2026 Waymark